Maina Devi And Anr. v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving cheque dishonour and dowry offences. They failed to comply with a prior order to deposit money. The court rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail.
What did the court decide?
The prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1796 of 2017
- Maina Devi
- Shiv Charan Saw ….. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ….. Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH
--------- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate.
12/Dated: 22/02/2018
Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No. 61 of 2016, corresponding to G.R. No. 255 of 2016, registered under Section 420 of the I.P.C. and Section 3 / 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit the petitioners on anticipatory bail despite non-compliance with prior court order to deposit money.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Maina Devi
- petitioner
Shiv Charan Saw
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
- respondent
Sahodari Devi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- A.B.A./1796/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court