The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the appellant's appeal in a motor accident case. The appellant failed to appear after being summoned twice to remove defects in the memorandum of appeal. Due to the deficiency and non-appearance, the appeal was dismissed.
Appeal dismissed due to default in appearing to remove defects.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M.A.NO.74 of 2015
----
Mohan Manjhi @ Mohan Kumar Hansda @ Lal Mohan Hansda, s/o late Kartik Chandr Hansda, r/o village-Dumrigora, P.O. Radhanagar, P.S.Pindrajora, District-Bokaro, Jharkhand. …Appellant.
Versus
…Respondents.
---- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
--------- For the Appellant : None. For the Respondent : ------
---------
04/06.02.2018 On repeated call none appears on behalf of appellant.
It transpires from record that when the matter was placed before the Joint Registrar(Judl) on 30.03.2015 two weeks time was granted for removing the defects. Thereafter, on 04.03.2016 the matter was placed before the Registrar General and again two weeks time was granted for removing the defects. But the defects pointed out by the office have not been removed. Today also none appears and defects have not been removed.
Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed.
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)
Biswas.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal should be allowed when the appellant failed to appear and remove defects despite prior notice.
Mohan Manjhi
Ram Bharos Yadav
Ram Surat Yadav
Rabisar Soren
The Divisional Manager, United Indian Insurance Co.Ltd.
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
