Appeal dismissed as appellants did not appear before the court despite repeated summons and failure to remove a defect pointed out by the office.
None granted; appeal dismissed due to non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc. Appeal No.653 of 2016
1. Durga Das Manjhi 2. Yogendra Manjhi 3. Jitlal Manjhi …… Appellants Versus
1. Sukhdeo Manjhi 2. Nandlal Manjhi 3. Hemanta Manjhi 4. Sidheshwar Manjhi @ Kisku 5. Sagar Manjhi 6. Nagen Manjhi 7. Chandi Charan Manjhi 8. Smt. Upasi Devi 9. Bhaneshwar Manjhi @ Manmohan Manjhi 10. Maheshwar Manjhi 11. Baldeo Manjhi 12. Rajendra Majhi 13. Gobardhan Manjhi 14. Sabaran Manjhi 15. Ajay Manjhi 16. Nagendra Manjhi 17. Vijay Manjhi 18. Sukhdeo Manjhi 19. Sanjay Manjhi 20. Jitendra Manjhi 21. Baleshwar Manjhi 22. Santu Manjhi 23. RabindraManjhi
…… Respondents
--------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAV K. GUPTA
For the Appellants : For the Respondents : ----------------------------
04 / Dated : 5th February, 2018
1. On repeated call none appears.
2. It transpires that the defect, as pointed by the office, has not
been removed.
3. This appeal stands dismissed.
(Amitav K. Gupta, J.)
NKC
Durga Das Manjhi
Yogendra Manjhi
Jitlal Manjhi
Sukhdeo Manjhi
Nandlal Manjhi
Hemanta Manjhi
Amitav K. Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
