The High Court of Jharkhand granted regular bail to the petitioner, Rayamoni Mandal, who was in custody since April 17, 2017, for offences under the IPC and IT Act involving impersonation of bank officials and swindling money via ATM cards.
Release on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/ - with two sureties of the like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No.5106 of 2017
Rajamoni Mandal … … Petitioner
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Kr. Rahul, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Addl.P.P.
04/06.10.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Addl.P.P. for
the State.
Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.98 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No.384 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414/419/420/467/468/471/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 66(B) (C) (D) of I.T. Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with co-accused persons have impersonated themselves as bank officers and after obtaining information about the details of A.T.M. Cards of the account holders of bank, he swindled away money from their bank accounts. It is submitted that the allegations are vague and omnibus in nature. It is also submitted that there is no overt act attributed to the petitioner. It is further submitted that other co-accused persons namely Ram Prasad Mandal, Arun Mandal & Barun Kumar Mandal @ Barun Mandal, Robin Mandal and Umesh Kumar Mandal @ Umesh Mandal have already been granted the privileges of anticipatory bail by this Court vide orders dated 29.06.2017, 01.07.2017, 05.07.2017 and 19.08.2017 in A.B.A. Nos.3649 of 2017, 3859 of 2017, 3839 of 2017 and 4907 of 2017 respectively. The petitioner is in custody since 17.04.2017 which has been mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. Hence, the petitioner may be released on bail.
Learned Addl.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of the counsel and the facts as discussed above, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara in connection with Karmatanr P.S. Case No.98 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No.384 of 2017.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Animesh/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be released on regular bail.
Whether the allegations of impersonation of bank officers and swindling money are vague and omnibus in nature.
Rajamoni Mandal
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
