The High Court of Jharkhand permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition filed by the petitioner with liberty to approach the trial court, without any substantive decision on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (C) No. 3492 of 2013
Syed Md. Nasim, S/o- Late Haji Syed Md. Halim, Mohalla Pathalkudwa, Near Mosque, Lower Bazar, Ranchi ... ... Petitioner
Versus
-2-
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Srivastava, Advocate Mr. Badal Vishal, Advocate For the Respondents : None
04/19.01.2015 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to move appropriate application before the trial court.
Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial court and the trial court would consider the same within three months.
(Shree Chandrashekhar, J.)
Tanuj/-
Syed Md. Nasim
Syed Md. Shamim
Syed Md. Wasim
Syed Md. Taslim
Syed Md. Naim
Syed Md. Kalim
Shree Chandrashekhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
