Nicolas Horo v. The State Of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, an accused in a murder case under Section 302 IPC, renewed his bail application after a previous rejection on merits. The single-judge bench held he should not be enlarged on bail and rejected the prayer. A thin order.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 2395 of 2015
Nicolas Horo
...… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand ...… Opposite Party
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate. Mr. S.K. Ganjhu, Advocate For the State : A.P.P.
3/06.07.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rania P.S case No. 24 of 2013 corresponding to G.R No.345 of 2013, S.T No.24 of 2014, for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The case relates to murder of the husband of the informant and the informant is an eyewitness to the occurrence.
There being direct allegation against the petitioner to have assaulted the deceased causing his death, earlier the bail application of this petitioner was rejected on merits by order dated 12.3.2014 in B.A No.1884 of 2014.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner accused in a murder case should be granted bail upon renewal of the prayer?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nicolas Horo
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand
Coram
H. C. Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- B.A./2395/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court