A writ petition was dismissed as infructuous because the court found the petitioners were now living happily as husband and wife.
None granted. Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 06
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 1662/2022 CM No. 4670/2022
Mohd Yasir and Anr.
….Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. K.K. Pathan, Advocate
V/s
UT of J&K and Ors.
….Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Anjali Badan, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER 04.11.2022
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievances
projected by the petitioners in this petition no longer survives as the petitioners are living happily as husband and wife without any interference from any person whatsoever. Therefore, the petition having been rendered infructuous is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Sanjeev Kumar) Judge
Jammu: 04.11.2022 Neha-1
Mohd Yasir and Anr.
UT of J&K and Ors.
SANJEEV KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
