This jurisdictional order dismisses a writ petition filed by the Union of India for non-prosecution, as the petitioner remained unrepresented and no steps were taken to serve the respondents after a final opportunity was granted.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 27
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OW104 No.9900001/2014
Union of India
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
M/s Chaman Lal and Co.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sanjay Kakkar, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR,JUDGE
ORDER
04.11.2022
On the last three consecutive dates of hearing, the petitioner remained un-
represented. Today also, when the case was called out, nobody turned up to represent the petitioner. Even steps for service of the respondents have not been taken despite last and final opportunity granted on 29th March, 2022.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sanjeev Kumar) Judge
Jammu
04.11.2022
Vinod, PS
Union of India
M/s Chaman Lal and Co.
SANJEEV KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
