The High Court dismissed an OWP for non-prosecution due to the continuous absence of the petitioners from the court since January 30, 2012, indicating a loss of interest by the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 3
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 1668/2011
IA No. 2316/2011
Gulam Rasool and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE
ORDER
None present for the petitioners. The petitioners had remained absent in
this case continuously since 30.01.2012 and they have not appeared before this
Court thereafter.
Due to continuance absence of the petitioners, it is made clear that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. As such, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, stands vacated.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Jammu 04.03.2022
Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Gulam Rasool and others
State of J&K and others
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
