Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 13
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 247/2011
IA No. 312/2011
Parkash Sharma and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. K. L. Pandita, Advocate
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Adarsh Sharma, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
Mr. K. L. Pandita, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission
of this Court to withdraw the present petition.
In view of this, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE
Jammu
03.03.2022 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Parkash Sharma and others
State of J&K and others
Vinod Chatterji Koul
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
