The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner remained absent from hearings and failed to file a status report, indicating a loss of interest in the matter.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 9
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 1657/2013
Abdul Rashid Parrey
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. S. S. Nanda, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, JUDGE ORDER
None present for the petitioner. Status report has also not been filed.
The petitioner had remained absent for the last two dates of hearing. It
seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. As
such, the present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL)
JUDGE
Jammu 04.03.2022 Neha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No
Abdul Rashid Parrey
State of J&K
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
