Shiv Dass v. Parvez Malik and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order dismissing a Criminal Public Service (CPSW) petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent and had lost interest in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 15
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 314/2010
Shiv Dass
….Petitioner(s)
Through:None.
V/s
Parvez Malik and another
….Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER
09.12.2022
On the previous date of hearing, i.e., 02.11.2022, nobody was present
on behalf of the petitioner. Same is the position today also. It seems that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rahul Bharti)
Judge
Jammu: 09.12.2022 Meenakshi
Shiv Dass
Parvez Malik
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court