The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on hearing dates, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr.No. 05
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
AA No. 21/2003 IA No. 88/2003
Mst. Anara Begum
….Petitioner(s)
Through:None.
V/s
State of J&K and others
….Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER
08.12.2022
On the last three dates of hearing, i.e., 01.07.2021, 10.03.2022 and 01.08.2022, nobody was present on behalf of the petitioner. Same is the position
today also. It seems that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this matter.
Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Rahul Bharti)
Judge
Jammu: 08.12.2022 Meenakshi
Mst. Anara Begum
State of J&K
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
