The appellant challenged an order derived from a suit already dismissed. The single judge held that the petition was infructuous as the underlying suit was dismissed, and dismissed the petition accordingly.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
30
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CR No. 25/2016 IA Nos. 1/2017, 1/2016
Balwan Singh
…..Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. R.S. Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ashwani Thakur, Advocate
Vs.
Pawan Singh
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aniruddh Sharma, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the
suit out of which the impugned order is arising stands already dismissed, hereby rendering the petition infructuous.
In view of the above, the petition having been rendered infructuous
is dismissed accordingly.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
JAMMU 08.09.2021 Pawan Angotra
Whether the order is speaking? : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable? : Yes/No
PAWAN ANGOTRA 2021.09.09 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present petition is maintainable when the underlying suit is already dismissed.
Balwan Singh
Pawan Singh
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
