The High Court at Jammu dismissed the petition in default due to the petitioner's prolonged absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case, thereby vacating any interim directions.
Petition dismissed in default; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
62
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
TrP(C) No. 3/2020 CM No. 369/2020
Priyanka Jamwal …..Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Rajeshwar Singh
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
No body has been appearing in this case on behalf of the petitioner
for quite some time. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecution of this case, the same is accordingly, dismissed in default of appearance and for non prosecution.
Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Sanjay Dhar) Judge
JAMMU
07.09.2021
Pawan Angotra
Whether the order is speaking? : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable? : Yes/No
PAWAN ANGOTRA 2021.09.08 14:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Priyanka Jamwal
Rajeshwar Singh
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
