The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a petition in default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner and lack of prosecution since the case was instituted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
40
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CONC No. 17/2018
Umesh Kumar Koul and others …..Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Chander Prabha and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
No body has appeared in this case ever since it was instituted. Today
also, nobody has appeared when the matter was called out.
It seems that the applicant is not interested in prosecution of the
case, the same is accordingly, dismissed in default of appearance and for nonprosecution.
(Sanjay Dhar)
Judge
JAMMU
08.09.2021
Pawan Angotra
Whether the order is speaking? : Yes/No
Whether the order is reportable? : Yes/No
PAWAN ANGOTRA 2021.09.09 10:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Umesh Kumar Koul and others
Chander Prabha and others
Sanjay Dhar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
