Petitioner sought withdrawal of criminal miscellaneous petition with liberty to file afresh. Court allowed the prayer and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 1534 of 2023.
Decided on : 7th August, 2023.
Anuj Sirkeck ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. ... .Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vinod Kumar Suman, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Addl. A.G.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file afresh. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge 7th August, 2023. (jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Anuj Sirkeck
State of H.P.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
