Single judge order allowing withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to avail appropriate remedy. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the instant petition allowed with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 247 of 2023.
Decided on : 4th August, 2023.
Janak Raj ...Petitioner.
Versus
Sandeep Kumar ... .Respondent. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Sharma, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ajay Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashist, Advocate.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
4th August, 2023. (jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Janak Raj
Sandeep Kumar
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
