This judgment records the withdrawal of Civil Revision No. 113 of 2023 by the petitioner, after permission for withdrawal was granted by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition; the petition and pending applications were dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Civil Revision No. 113 of 2023.
Decided on : 4th August, 2023.
Julfi Ram ...Petitioner. Versus Haria Ram & Ors. ... .Respondents.
| Coram: |
|---|
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. |
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Gurinder Singh Parmar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Nemo.
Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral).
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant petition. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as also, the pending applications, if any.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
4th August, 2023. (jai)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Julfi Ram
Haria Ram & Ors.
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
