The petitioner applied for substitution of a deceased decree holder, but failed to provide instructions or take steps despite repeated court opportunities. The court dismissed the execution petition for non-prosecution.
Execution petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
M/s Bhagwati Chemical vs. M/s Mehak Chemicals.
Ex. Pet. No. 12 of 2021.
04.08.2023 Present: Mr. Praveen Chandel, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Judgment debtor already ex-parte.
Despite repeated opportunities, no steps have been taken for substitution of deceased decree holder. In the absence of instructions, this Court has no option but to dismiss the instant execution petition for non prosecution. Accordingly, the execution petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
4th August, 2023. (jai)
1 issue framed by the court
whether to proceed with the execution petition in the absence of instructions for substituting the deceased decree holder
M/s Bhagwati Chemical
M/s Mehak Chemicals
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
