Hemant Kumar v. Hpseb Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA Execution…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
Execution Petition No. 72 of 2016 Date of Decision: 24.5.2017
Hemant Kumar …..Petitioner. Versus HPSEB and Ors. ….Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohan Chauhan, Advocate, for the respondents.
Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral)
Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Senior Advocate, has
placed on record instructions dated 23.5.2017, which are taken on record. The order stands complied with in its letter and spirit and as such, petition stands disposed of accordingly. We appreciate the efforts put in by Mr. Satyen Vaidya, Senior Advocate, in ensuring that the grievances of the petitioner stand redressed with compassion. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
( Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice 24th May, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ), Manjit Judge.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Hemant Kumar
HPSEB and Ors.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court