Contempt petition disposed of because the underlying review petition in a related college case no longer survives, rendering the present matter academic.
Contempt petition disposed of as it no longer survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
COPC No. 1 4 of 2017 Date of Decision: 18.5.2017 _____________ Dr. Suman Kumari …..Petitioner. Versus Hari Sen ....Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
_____________ For the Petitioner: Mr. Shyam Singh Chauhan, Advocate For the respondent Mr. Yudhbir Singh Thakur, Advocate
Sandeep Sharma,J. (oral)
In view of order dated 18.5.2017 passed in
review petition No. 4 of 2017, titled as Maharaja Lakshman
Sen Memorial College Vs. State of H.P. & others , present contempt petition does not survive and as such the same is disposed of.
( Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge.
May 18, 2017 (veena)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Maharaja Lakshman Sen Memorial College Vs. State of H.P. & othersReferred¶8
review petition No. 4 of 2017, titled as Maharaja Lakshman Sen Memorial College Vs. State of H.P. & others
Dr. Suman Kumari
Hari Sen
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
