The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of this writ petition as not pressed. The petitioner declined to proceed, reserving liberty to make representations to the authorities.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.703 of 2017 Date of decision: 24.05.2017
Kumari Priyanka & others .Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. & others . Respondents
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners: Mr.S.D. Gill, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr.Anup Rattan, Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr.Ashok Sharma, ASGI, with Mr.Ajay Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.3.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
It appears that inadvertently the Registry has placed the reply, so filed in ‘CWP No.703 of 2016, titled as Shashi Bhushan & another vs. State of H.P. & others’, in CWP No.703 of 2017. Registry to take necessary consequential steps.
2
present petition, reserving liberty to the petitioners to make representation(s) before the respondent-authorities.
With the aforesaid observations, present petition stands disposed of as not pressed, so also pending application(s), if any.
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
May 24, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ) (vt) Judge
Kumari Priyanka & others
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
