Disposed

Chhavi Ram v. State of Hp

Himachal Pradesh HC18 May 2017CWP/617/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of CWP 617 of 2017 by directing petitioner to approach concerned authorities within a week. Authorities must consider petition's grievances dispassionately, afford hearing opportunity within two weeks, and assign reasons if order is unfavorable.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to approach concerned authorities within one week for consideration of grievances with hearing opportunity within two weeks and reasoned orders.

Chhavi Ram Vs State of Hp — Environment and Pollution | Himachal Pradesh HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA

¶2

CWP No. 617 of 2017

¶3

Date of Decision: 18.5.2017

Chhavi Ram

…Petitioner

Versus

State of H.P. & others

¶8

…Respondents

¶9

Coram

¶10

Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?

¶11

_________________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.

¶12

For the respondents : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State.

¶13

Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that petitioner shall be content if a direction is issued to the respondents-authorities to consider the petitioner’s request, which he would be making, venting out his grievances emanating from the impugned order dated 22.6.2015 (Annexure P-1), passed by Assistant Collector, Grade-1, order dated 23.9.2015, passed by Sub Divisional Collector (Annexure P-2), order dated 19.5.2015, passed by the Divisional Commissioner (Annexure P-3) and order dated 27.9.2016, passed by Financial Commissioner (Annexure P-4). As such, as prayed for, we disposed of the present petition

¶15

¶16

with a direction to the petitioner to approach the authorities concerned, within a period of one week. As and when any such request is received, we are hopeful that the authorities shall consider the same dispassionately, taking into account the hardships of the petitioner, after affording due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of two weeks thereafter. Needless to add, if the order is not in favour of the petitioner, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioner.

¶17

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶18

Copy dasti.

¶19

(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice

¶20

(Sandeep Sharma) Judge

¶21

May 18, 2017

¶22

Kalpana

¶23

Chhavi Ram v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chhavi Ram v. State of Hp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bir Singh Vs State of Hp

Vijay Kumar Heer Vs International Centre of Distance Education and Open Learning

Baldev Singh Minhas Vs Shashi Shekher

Maharaja Lakshman Sen Memorial College Vs State of Hp

Dr. Suman Kumari Vs Hari Sen

Ms Narsehain Engineers and BuildersPvt.Ltd. Vs Hpseb Ltd.