In this contempt petition, the court dismissed the plea holding that no case for contempt was established. Consequently, the notice issued was discharged.
The contempt petition was dismissed and the notice was discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
COPC No. 502 of 2012.
Decided on: May 28, 2013.
Raj Kumar & Ors. …Petitioner.
Versus
Kartar Singh Verma … Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dev Darshan Sud, Judge.
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the petitioners. : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate For the respondent. : Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate.
Dev Darshan Sud, J. (Oral):
Heard. Dismissed as no contempt is made out. Notice
discharged.
(Dev Darshan Sud), Judge. May 28, 2013 (ss). (Dharam Chand Chaudhary), Judge.
1 Whether the reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt is made out in the present case.
Raj Kumar
Kartar Singh Verma
Dev Darshan Sud
Dharam Chand Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
