On December 17, 2010, the High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, allowed the petitioner to withdraw a C.R. No. 65 of 2009 to file an appeal, relying on Section 14 of the Limitation Act, and disposed of the pending application.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; pending applications disposed of; limitation extension applied under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
C.R. No. 65 of 2009. Decided on: 17th December, 2010.
Karnail Singh. …Petitioner. -VersusDes Raj and another. …Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Mr. Naresh Kaul, Advocate. For respondent No. 1. : Mr. Vivek Singh Thakur and Mr. Harish K. Verma, Advocates. None for respondent No. 2. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) :
Mr. Naresh Kaul, learned counsel for the petitioner
prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, in order to enable the petitioner to file an appeal before the 1st Appellate Court, as prescribed under the law. It is made clear that since the petitioner has been pursuing the remedy before this Court, the limitation will not come in his way, in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
Copy dasti, on usual terms.
(Rajiv Sharma) Judge
November 17, 2010. (bhupender)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.
Karnail Singh
Des Raj
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
