The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to intervening developments. No substantive rulings were made.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications, if any, dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No.: 9363 of 2008.
Decided on: 16.12.2010.
Rameshwar Singh. … Petitioner. Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. … Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J.
Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P. Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General for respondent No.1. Mr. Varun Chandel, Advocate vice Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant Solicitor General of India for respondent No.2.
Rajiv Sharma, J. (oral) :
Mr. R.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous due to intervening developments. Consequently, the same is dismissed having become infructuous, so also the pending application(s), if any. No costs.
(Rajiv Sharma), Judge. December 16, 2010. (sck).
1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Rameshwar Singh
State of Himachal Pradesh
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
