This court disposed of a civil writ petition covered by the precedent Hira Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh. The petitioner was directed to have his case considered based on the propositions laid down in that judgment within two months.
Petitioner directed to have his case considered based on Hira Lal judgments within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No.9172 of 2008. Decided on: 16.12.2010.
| Sahaj Ram Thakur. ……….Petitioner. |
|---|
| Versus |
| State of Himachal Pradesh and others. ……….Respondents. |
| Coram |
| The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, J. Whether approved for reporting?1 |
| For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. |
| For the respondents : Mr.P.M.Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P.Singh, Assistant Advocate General. |
Rajiv Sharma, J. (Oral)
The present lis is covered by the judgment rendered by this court in C.W.P. No. 319 of 1997, titled as Hira Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, decided on 17th June, 2008.
(Rajiv Sharma) Judge December 16, 2010. (krt)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hira Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and anotherFollowed¶5
C.W.P. No. 319 of 1997, Hira Lal Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another
Sahaj Ram Thakur
State of Himachal Pradesh
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
