The Gauhati High Court at Itanagar Bench held that the respondent had complied with a prior order dated 13.02.2026. Consequently, the pending contempt petition was closed without further adjournment or substantive relief being granted.
The contempt petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008032026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/21/2026
Marto Kamgo
Son of Late Kimar Kamgo, permanent resident of Kamki Village, PO and PS Kamba, West Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh.
VERSUS
Manish Kumar Gupta and Anr IAS, the Chief Secretary, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh. 2:Adesh Kumar Singh Age: 0 Occupation : IAS the Commissioner Department of Power (Electrical) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh
Advocate for the Petitioner : Rintu Saikia, Sr. Adv, Muchi Mele,Mindo Taso,Idak Bam,Limi Bam,J Das,Ligam Nochi
Advocate for the Respondent : Lissing Perme,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA
ORDER
Date : 15.09.2026
(K. Ete, J.)
It is submitted at the Bar that the order of this Court dated
Page No.# 2/2
13.02.2026, passed in WA No.28/2024 has duly been complied with.
Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.
Mr. I. Bam, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N. Ratan, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor No.1 as well as Mr. L. Perme, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor No.2 are present.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.15 16:30:34 +05'30'
Marto Kamgo
Manish Kumar Gupta
Adesh Kumar Singh
Karadak Ete
Anjan Moni Kalita
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
