Dismissed
Yumpe Taipodia v. Marto Riba
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/10/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC040005342023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC040005342023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040005342023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/10/2023
Yumpe Taipodia Age: 50 Occupation : Address:S/o Doyum Taipodia Resident of Village Liru PO/PS Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS Marto Riba Age: 0 Occupation : Address:The Deputy Commissioner Likabali Lower Siang District Arunachal Pradesh. -----------Advocate for : T T Tara Sr. Adv Advocate for : I Riram appearing for Marto Riba: Advocate appearing for respectively.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
Page No.# 2/2
Date : 16.09.2026
Heard Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the petitioner.
The alleged contemnor has filed the affidavit by annexing the order dated 04.12.2023. It reflects that the petitioner was heard as per the direction of this Court dated 25.01.2023 wherein, the petitioner appears to have admitted that all the plots of land where the LPCs have been issued are not disturbed from any side, accordingly, it has been decided by the alleged contemnor that the plots of land where the LPC have been issued to the petitioner and his relatives will be entered and showed in the index list of map of the final notice as and when the entire matter regarding headquarter issues will be resolved.
Although Mr. B. Picha, learned counsel for the petitioner has strenuously submitted that the alleged contemnor has violated the order of this Court before hearing the petitioner, this Court is of unhesitant view that the order of this Court dated 25.01.2023 has duly been complied with.
Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Digitally signed by TAGE BUNYI Date: 2026.09.16 15:16:34 +05'30'
Yumpe Taipodia
Marto Riba
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court