This is a brief order in a contempt petition where the court found that the impugned orders in a writ appeal had been complied with and closed the petition.
Contempt petition stands closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040008972024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/20/2024
Ramu Welly
Son of Shri Nobo Welly, Village Seijosa, PO and PS Seijosa, Pakke Kessang District, Arunachal Pradesh
VERSUS
Vivek Pandey and 2 Ors Commissioner (Urban Affairs) Govt of Arunachal Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Itanagar 2:Rokpo Tamin Age: 0 Occupation : 3:Himmar Ete Age: 0 Occupation
Advocate for the Petitioner : T T Tara
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
ORDER
03.09.2024
(Kardak Ete, J.)
Heard Mr. K. Apa, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Tapin, learned counsel for the respondent no. 1.
The learned counsel for the parties have submitted that the orders dated 29.01.2024 and 29.04.2024 passed in Writ Appeal No. 06/2024 have duly been complied with.
Accordingly, the present contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ramu Welly
Vivek Pandey
Rokpo Tamin
Himmar Ete
Part hivjyoti Saikia
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
