Dismissed
Rajak Uddin Ahmed v. Pabitra Gogoi
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/466/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010178232024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010178232024 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010178232024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/466/2024
RAJAK UDDIN AHMED
S/O- LATE ROHIM UDDIN AHMED, R/O- VILL.- RONGAGORA ROAD, NEAR ADITYA HOSPITAL, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN- 782447.
VERSUS
PABITRA GOGOI
CHAIRMAN, TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD, TINSUKIA, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN- 782447.
For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. K. Purkayastha, Advocate : Mr. R. C. Paul, Advocate
For the Respondent(s) : None appears.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
ORDER
Date : 06.09.2024
Mr. A. K. Purkayastha, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that he would not like to press the instant contempt petition.
Page No.# 2/2
2. Accordingly, the instant contempt proceedings stands dropped.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
RAJAK UDDIN AHMED
PABITRA GOGOI
DEVASHIS BARUAH
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court