Allowed

The Appsc v. The Secretary Home and 5 Ors.

Gauhati HC3 Sept 2024IA(C)/151/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Gauhati High Court, Itanagar Bench allowed an amendment application to correct the address particulars of private respondents in a connected Writ Appeal from 'Secretary, APPSC' to 'Director General of Police, Govt of Arunachal Pradesh', upon no objection from respondents.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is allowed to amend the cause title in respect of the particulars of the address of the respondents nos. 4, 5 and 6.

The Appsc Vs The Secretary Home and 5 Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Gauhati HC (2024)

¶1

Page No.# 1/4

¶2

GAHC040011462024

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

¶4

IA(C)/151/2024

¶5

The APPSC Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the Secretary Itanagar Arunachal Pradesh VERSUS The Secretary Home and 5 Ors Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Govt of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 791111 2:The Director General of Police

¶6

Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar

¶7

3:Wangrum Hosai

¶8

Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Son of Chuwang Hosai G-Extension resident of Kaimai village P.O. Kaimai P.S Khonsa Arunachal Pradesh

¶9

Page No.# 2/4

¶10

4:Deveso Chaitom

¶11

Age: 0 Occupation : Address:C/o the Secretary APPSC Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 5:Bharat Rai Age: 0 Occupation : Address:C/o Secretary APPSC Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 6:Gopak Tok Age: 0 Occupation : Address:C/o Secretary APPSC Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar -----------Advocate for : Nani Anju Advocate for : appearing for The Secretary Home and 5 Ors: Advocate , , , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, respectively.

¶12

Page No.# 3/4

¶13

BEFORE

¶14

HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE

ORDER

04.09.2024

(Kardak Ete, J.)

Heard Ms. N. Anju, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. S. Tapin, learned Senior Government Advocate, Arunachal Pradesh appearing for the respondents/opposite party nos. 1 and 2.

¶19

By filing this application, the applicant has prayed for amendment of the cause title in respect of the particulars of the addresses of the private respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 in the connected Writ Appeal No. 33/2023.

¶20

The learned counsel for the respondents/opposite parties nos. 1 and 2 has raised no objection regarding amendment.

¶21

It appears that the particulars of the addresses of the private respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 were given in the writ appeal aforesaid as “C/o- Secretary, APPSC, Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar-791111’, which are not a correct address.

¶22

Considering above, we deem it appropriate to allow this application by allowing the applicant to amend the cause title in respect of the particulars of the address of the private respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6.

¶23

Accordingly, the applicant is allowed to amend the cause title in respect of particulars of the address of the respondent nos. 4, 5 and 6 as “C/o- The Director General of Police (DGP), Government of Arunachal Pradesh, Itanagar-791111.”

¶24

The IA (C) stands allowed and disposed of.

¶25

Page No.# 4/4

¶26

JUDGE JUDGE

¶27

Comparing Assistant

The Appsc v. The Secretary Home and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Appsc v. The Secretary Home and 5 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramu Welly Vs Vivek Pandey and 2 Ors.

The Appsc Vs The Secretary Home and 3 Ors.

Smti Likha Yager Vs The State of Ap and 10 Others

Job Modi Vs The State of Ap and Anr.