The Gauhati High Court dropped the instant contempt proceedings after the petitioner submitted that the order in WP(C)No.5054/2022 dated 14.11.2022 had been duly complied with and no further proceedings were required.
The instant contempt proceedings are dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010102592024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/278/2024
MAYMALA BIBI
W/O- LATE ANSER ALI @ ANSAR ALI, VILL.- KATHALDI PART-1, P.O. AND P.S. BILASIPARA, DIST. DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN- 783348.
VERSUS
GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI AND ANR THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND D.M. DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6.
2:DIBAKAR NATH THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER DHUBRI ASSAM P.O. P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783301
Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. AK Mollah
Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. PR Mahanta
For respondent No.1 Mr. J Handique Government Advocate, Assam
Page No.# 2/2
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER
02.09.2024
Mr. AK Mollah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the order dated 14.11.2022 passed in WP(C)No.5054/2022 has been duly complied with and as such, the petitioner would not like to further proceed with the instant contempt proceedings.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceedings should be dropped given the petitioner's submission that the previous order was duly complied with.
MAYMALA BIBI
GYANENDRA DEV TRIPATHI
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (RELIEF AND REHABILITATION) AND D.M. DEPARTMENT, DISPUR
DIBAKAR NATH
Devashis Baruah
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
