Musstt. Rupsane Begum v. Smt. Monalisha Goswami
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition concerning partial compliance with a court direction, the High Court held that substantial compliance existed, particularly after a status quo order was passed in related civil proceedings. The court consequently closed the petition for the parties to settle disputes in the title suit.
What did the court decide?
Petition stands closed.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010027462018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/74/2018
MUSSTT. RUPSANE BEGUM W/O. LT. MIRZAN ALI, R/O. HEDAYATPUR, GUWAHATI CLUB, GUWAHATI, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
VERSUS
SMT. MONALISHA GOSWAMI THE COMMISSIONER, GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PANBAZAR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA, SR.ADV.
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
03-05-2023
Heard Shri Mahboob Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri S. Bora, learned counsel for the respondent.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Penal Petition should be closed given substantial compliance with the impugned order and a status quo order in related proceedings.
Whether the allegations of willful disobedience of a direction dated 13.02.2017 warrant punishment in the present petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RUPSANE BEGUM
- respondent
MONALISHA GOSWAMI
- respondent
THE COMMISSIONER, GUWAHATI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/74/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court