The High Court closed a contempt petition upon the petitioner's counsel stating that the petitioner has already obtained the benefit sought and instructed not to press the matter.
Contempt petition stands closed on satisfaction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010073232018
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/154/2018
ALA UDDIN LASKAR
S/O LATE SAID ALI LASKAR, R/O VILLAGE AND PO GANGANAGAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
PRITAM SAIKIA AND 3 ORS. COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006
2:BHABESH DEKA DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006
3:NURUL HAQUE MAJARBHUIYA DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS SILCHAR PO SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN-78800
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. JUNM LASKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA
BEFORE
Page No.# 2/2
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 08.05.2023
Upon instruction, Mr. JUNM Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has got the benefit for which the contempt petition has been filed.
Accordingly, he has instruction not to press this matter. Accordingly, the matter stands closed on satisfaction.
The respondents are represented.
Comparing Assistant
ALA UDDIN LASKAR
PRITAM SAIKIA
COMMISSIONER TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM
BHABESH DEKA
NURUL HAQUE MAJARBHUIYA
KALYAN RAI SURANA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
