In this contempt petition, the respondent submitted that the impugned order under contempt had been complied with vide an order dated 02.06.2022. Finding compliance established, the Court disposed of the contempt petition and discharged the rule.
Contempt petition disposed of; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010158262022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/456/2022
MOFUR UDDIN S/O-LATE ABDUL GOFUR, R/O- VILLAGE JOGODISHPUR, P.O- JOGODISHPUR, DIST- CACHAR, ASSAM
VERSUS
FAZLUL HAQUE CHOUDHURY ADDL. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, SECONDRY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06
For the Petitioner(s) :
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. R. Mazumdar, Adv.
BEFORE
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
ORDER
02.05.2023
Mr. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the order
Page No.# 2/2
under contempt was complied with by passing an order dated 02.06.2022 which has again been put to challenge by the petitioner by filing WP(C) No.5221/2022.
In view of the submission noted above, and as the order under contempt has been complied with, the contempt petition is disposed of.
Rule is discharged.
Sd/- Sandeep Mehta CHIEF JUSTICE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should be disposed of in light of compliance with the prior order.
MOFUR UDDIN S/O-LATE ABDUL GOFUR
FAZLUL HAQUE CHOUDHURY
Sandeep Mehta
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
