Munu Bengia v. The State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner challenged a transfer order. Petitioner's counsel stated the transfer was cancelled, rendering the writ petition infructuous. Court closed the case.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC040006022021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C) 205/2021
1:Munu Bengia S/O Lt. Epo Bengia, MMGS - III (Manager),
O/O SBI, NLG Branch, Dist. Papumpare (Itanagar Capital Complex), A.P 791110
VERSUS
1:The State Bank OF India
Represented by the Chairman, Central Office, SBI, State Bank Bhavan, Madame Cama Road, 400001,Mumbai, Maharashtra
- 2:General Manager SBI Local head office Dispur Guwahati 781005
- 3:Dy General Manager SBI Administrative Office Dibrugarh P.O Dibrugarh Assam 786004
- 4:Assistant General Manager SBI Naharlagun Branch G - Extension P.O/PS Naharlagun Dist. Papumpare A.P 79111
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Munu Bengia
- respondent
The State Bank of India
Coram
NANI TAGIA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP(C)/205/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court