The State of Ap v. Ganesh Mech
Case brief
What is this about?
Interlocutory application in a writ petition under Article 226 was not pressed by the government advocate and was dismissed accordingly.
What did the court decide?
Dismissal of interlocutory application as not pressed.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040001112022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C) 15/2022
1:THE STATE OF AP
Represented by the Superintending Engineer, PWD, Basar Circle, Leparada District, Govt. of AP
VERSUS
1:Ganesh Mech
Son of Late Gobin Mech, Resident of Silapathar, Somobai Gaon, PO/PS Silapathar, District Dhemaji, Assam, Pin No. 787059
Advocate for the Petitioner : GA (AP)
Advocate for the Respondent : Madan Mili
Linked Case : WP(C) 296/2021
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The State of AP (and 4 Ors.)
- respondent
Ganesh Mech
Coram
Nani Tagia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- IA(C)/15/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court