Masuma Ahmed v. Dr. Bijoya Choudhury, Acs
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner and respondent represented compliance with the Court's earlier order and endorsed the submission. The writ petition was closed.
The petitioner and respondent represented compliance with the Court's earlier order and endorsed the submission. The writ petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010162622021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/380/2021
MASUMA AHMED
W/O AMINUR ISLAM AHMED, VILL-DUMARDAHA PT-I, P.O.-BALAJAN, P.S.GAURIPUR, DIST-DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN-783331
VERSUS
DR. BIJOYA CHOUDHURY, ACS DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M R KHANDAKAR
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R-1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
07-03-2022
Shri P.K. Borah, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the order of this Court has been complied with.
Shri M.R. Khandakar, learned counsel for the petitioner endorses the said submission.
Page No.# 2/2
The writ petition accordingly stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Masuma Ahmed
Dr. Bijoya Choudhury
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court