Kaheka Pralo v. Kaling Tayeng and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner alleged that responding IAS officers failed to appoint remaining members of the Arunachal Pradesh State Human Rights Commission, contrary to a 2014 order. The Court held the petition was not consistent with the scope of the impugned order and that the limitation period had expired.
What did the court decide?
Court did not entertain the contempt petition and permitted the petitioner to agitate the matter in the proper forum.