The Gauhati High Court disposed of Contempt Case No. 22/2021 as infructuous, holding that since the petitioners had received all benefits sought in the connected writ petition earlier, the contempt proceedings no longer served any purpose.
Contempt Case No. 22/2021 disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010008302021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Cont.Cas(C)/22/2021
RANU KALITA TAMULI AND ANR W/O LATE JAGAT CHANDAR TAMULI R/O MAJGAON NIKAMIL SATRA P.S. TAZPUR P.O. NIKAMIL SATRA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM.
2: JNANARSHI TAMULI
S/O LATE JAGAT CHANDAR TAMULI R/O MAJGAON NIKAMIL SATRA P.S. TEZPUR P.O. NIKAMIL SATRA DIST. SONITPUR ASSAM. VERSUS
RAMENDRA NATH SARMA ACS COMMISSIONER ASSAM STATE HOUSING BOARD R.G. BARUAH ROAD GUWAHATI 5 KAMRUP (M) ASSAM.
-----------Advocate for : MR. S BORA
Advocate for : MR. I CHOUDHURY appearing for RAMENDRA NATH SARMA ACS
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. SEMA
ORDER
Date : 04.03.2022
Mr. S. Bora, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the petitioners have received all the benefits sought for in the W.P.(C) No. 2788/2018, the Contempt Case No. 22/2021 may be disposed of as infructuous.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case No. 22/2021 is disposed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ranu Kalita Tamuli and another
Ramendra Nath Sarma
K. Sema
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
