M/S Manoj and Company v. Sailesh and 9 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Gauhati High Court closed a contempt application alleging violation of a previous order directing payment of outstanding vehicle repair bills. The court allowed the petitioner to approach a competent civil forum instead of adjudicating the contempt plea.
What did the court decide?
Application closed; petitioner at liberty to approach appropriate forum of competent jurisdiction to establish its claim for the amount.
What the court decided
Page No.# 1/4
GAHC010006882014
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/117/2014
M/S MANOJ and COMPANY
THROUGH ITS PARTNER SRI MANOJ BAGREE, S/O LT. HANKMAL BAGREE R/O RAHMAN ROAD, JORHAT, P.O. and DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM.
VERSUS
SAILESH and 9 ORS. COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, HOME DEPARTMENT , DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006.
2:SRI KHAGEN SARMA DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7.
3:SRI BHASKAR JYOTI MAHANTA DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL and POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI.
4:AMRANJIT KOR KONWAR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM.
5:SRI ASOK SARMA THE S.T.O. POLICE RESERVE JORHAT ASSAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application alleging violation of a previous order should be adjudicated or closed when a claim for paid sum lacks departmental sanction.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M/s Manoj and Company Through its Partner Sri Manoj Bagree
- respondent
Sailesh and 9 Ors. Commissioner
Coram
Manish Choudhury
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Gauhati HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- Cont.Cas(C)/117/2014
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court