The Gauhati High Court observed that the petitioner's application had become infructuous due to the lapse of time and closed the matter accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No. 1/1
GAHC010124782021
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont. Cas(C)/276/2021
ATAUR RAHMAN
S/O LATE HUSSAIN ALI
CHAIRMAN OF GUWAHATI SUB-DIVISIONAL REGULATED MARKET COMMITTEE, BIJOYNAGAR, KAMRUP, GUWAHATI-22.
VERSUS
DIBYOJYOTI BARUAH
SECRETARY, GUWAHATI SUB-DIVISIONAL REGULATED MARKET COMMITTEE, UPARHALI, (BIJOYNAGAR), KAMRUP, GUWAHATI-22.
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. N J GOGOI
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY
ORDER
Date : 02-03-2022
Mr. R.A. Chouhdury, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to lapse of time, the application has become infructuous.
Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel for the sole respondent is present.
In view of the above submission made by Mr. R.A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner, the application is closed as infructuous.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Ataur Rahman
Dibyjoyoti Baruah
Manish Choudhury
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
