Petitioner's counsel reported compliance with prior court direction; the contempt petition was closed without further operative relief.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010017882019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 45/2019
1:EKTA LASKAR AND ANR.
R/O- NANDALAYA, 3- GANESH MANDIR PATH, NEAR GUWAHATI TINIALI, GHY- 20
2: HEMANTA LASKAR R/O- NANDALAYA 3 GANESH MANDIR PATH NEAR GUWAHATI TINIALI GHY- 2
VERSUS
1:KULADHAR SAIKIA
IPS, DGP ASSAM, ASSAM POLICE HQ, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI- 781007
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R SENSUA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. R K D CHOUDHURY
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 07-06-2019
Mr. P. Borah, on behalf of Mr. R. Sensua, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the direction of this Court has been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt petition can be closed.
In view of the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, the contempt petition stands closed.
Page No.# 2/2
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
EKTa LASKAR AND ANR.
KULADHAR SAIKIA
Michael Zothankhuma
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
