On the advice of counsel that the impugned order was already set aside by the Division Bench in related appeals, the single judge held that nothing survives for further consideration in the contempt petition. The matter was closed.
Closes the contempt petition; nothing survives for further consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010114802019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C) 292/2019
1:IZAZ YUSUF AHMED
S/O- SALAHUDDIN AHMED, R/O- H.NO.20, BSHNU RABHA PATH, BELTOLA, GHY,, KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN- 781028
VERSUS
1:DIPAK KR. SARMA AND 2 ORS.
CHAIRMAN (I/C), ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, JAWAHAR NAGAR, KHANAPARA, GHY- 22
2:PRAKASH RANJAN GHARPHALIA SECY. ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA GHY- 22
3:PUBALI GOHAIN PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATION ASSAM PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION JAWAHAR NAGAR KHANAPARA GHY- 2
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S BORTHAKUR
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. KOTISWAR SINGH
ORDER
Date : 04-06-2019
Though no one is present for the petitioner.
It has been submitted by Mr. R. K. Talukdar, learned counsel for the respondent that the order alleged to be violated i.e. order dated 06.05.2019 passed in WP (C) 2187/2019 has been set aside by the Division Bench of this Court today in W.A. No. 142/2019 and W. A. No. 144/2019.
In view of the above, this Court is of the view that nothing survives for further consideration in the contempt petition.
Accordingly, the same is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
IZAZ YUSUF AHMED
DIPAK KR. SARMA AND 2 ORS.
N. KOTISWAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
