The single judge disposed of the Single Arbitration (SA) application as withdrawn after the applicant deposited the entire demanded amount and settled the dispute.
SA disposed of as withdrawn; Record consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| s4928t22 02/02t24 |
Appticantby ShriGhanshyamSharma, Advocate Respondent-BankbyShriSuyeshMohanGuru, Advocate Counselforthe Appticanthasfitedanapplicationfor withdrawal1A750124dated31101124supportedwith AffidavitofShriSaeedArifHussain,ApplicantNo.-3, forwithdrawatofSA.ltis statedthattheAppticant hasfil.edthepresentSAassaitingtheactionofthe bankinitiatedundertheprovisionsofSecuritisation Act.ltisfurtherstatedthatduringthependencyof theSAtheAppticanthaddepositedthe entireamount asmentionedindemandnotice andthedispute settledsincethematterhasbeencompromised.He furtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentSA. Consideringtheaffidavitof theAppticant himsetfand thesubmissionmadebytheCounselforApplicant thattheAppticanthasdepositedtheentireas mentionedinthedemandnoticethepresentSA standsdisposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedtotherecordroom. (RamNiwas Patet) Presidingofficer |
Y Y v |
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Applicant (Shri Saeed Arif Hussain)
Respondent (Shri Ghanshyam Sharma / Bank)
Ram Niwas Patet
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
