Munna Lohar v. Au Small Finance Bank Limited
DRTSA/735/2022
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
1
¶2
's.q. iq{ -zss /zozz
¶3
mq ilq-fr oTko-*wqErdgq (q.Y.'dffiirq)
¶4
(ffi{ eTffi - nrftq +ft vrq fursqaa)
¶5
vs.g. =iT{ - rcs/zozz
¶6
- g=Tr dlilT, frfl-E{rfu dil-{, gq o-ftq 65 q{, ffi ;T. 01, qr{rft oetnr iqq 10, rITqriqr{ra q+{t, ilE-ft-f, drril,fudr esqrfi (vn*1 2. fr errqrq elton, frdT 5=n-dEN, sq 6-ftq 26q{, ffi q. 01, qeqrfr awr iqq 10,qtq riqrqa q-+{t, ildfra dtrqr,fud-rq-s-{rft (w t I 3. ffi ffiqT d6t{,qfr Gi-{qtst oY6rq,ss o-ft-q 2s sS, ffi q. 01, q-{rft Ecffil =iw 10, qFI rdrqfl Er+{r iloft-d +ril., fudTqsqrft (wt) oTril{firruT !
¶7
M
¶8
- eTertrtwglrfuTl(,q.Xda wrf+fl tfi ftrfr. tr-.ft+iftile{, rftT trtggd frfrc.T siq Br{ Tf,^d dqlqi, fusq qfTq, g(h (wt)
¶9
2.qiq ttq{,qXr$a wrt+s to ftfr. rgwf{qrq {IilqFF[, s{qt{ Fqft)
¶10
- fudr tftrft,qsqrft, ftrflr qsqrft (wt) 4. ffifl-f,fl{, ddqtf,q-sqrfr, fudT qsq-rft (vqft) voqqrftTq t
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court