The Delhi Revenue Tribunal allowed the applicant bank's application as withdrawn, noting the respondents had settled accounts and deposited Rs. 86,00,000/-, leading the bank to request case withdrawal.
Application disposed of as withdrawn. Record consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No......
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1079 02102124 t,,,L |
t ShriAbhishekAgrawal,AdvfortheApplicar Noneforthe Defendants |
|
| TheCounselforApplicanthasfiled applicationalongwithaffidavit ofShriPrabhat Shrivasatava,PostManager(LAW),on 16101124whichisonrecord.Itisstatedby theDeponent onoaththatduringthependency ofthemattertheDefendants have settledthe accountand haddepositedan amountofRs. 86,00,000/-.Itisfurtherdeposedthatthe accounthasbeen closedaccordingly.The counselforthe Applicant-Bankfurtherprays for withdrawal ofthe instantcase. |
||
| Keepinginviewthefact that theDefendants have depositedthe compromise amountofRs. 86,00,000/-and the Applicant-Bankdoesnot wishtoprosecutethecasefurther, thepresent OAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Record beconsignedtotherecordroom. (Ram NiwasPatel) Presidin Officer D.R.T, Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
CONTD. ORDER.SFIEET
PAGE No..
CASE No.
| DATE REMARK DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER |
|---|
Applicant-Bank
Defendants
Ram Niwas Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
