Rajendra Kumar Pandey v. State Bank of India
DRTSA/939/2022
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶2
PAGE No.
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER DATE |
REMARK |
|---|---|
| g.e3e/zozz |
|
| 31.01 siltffissTdfuqfrB-tr{GTq-.ItrI erBrmrt |
|
| sn{qrftsHdfuqfr{rgdg} 31ffimt |
|
| 1.srqsfls\Glrd-q-rsHfrtGil(t trqf,frriTSffiqsIIlEqil4s/zozs qr{tffiqri eTffiq{EqrrRIIt 2.qrFwro-rGi-{dtfinfuqT.rqrtt 3.sri-{6sqTo.tWqildtfusiltffi se{t-ii.I{qn fu{rr14.07.2022w sil-Bqrq{1anfrfu11.11.2022,Cg+fi titgqcnwl q-{gdfu-qt,fuEB-f,{qrfi tfiHr<rgsro-sqd6fu-66ddtr{ dqful"-sqttrsfufr6rc.08.2023rqtrq+ qdYn+trsfuirfros.1z.zo2snfudor frqr,fu=g$qfrdlr1anr,oil-Bq-iq{f,rT o\ilw{frrtqfimrot$o-xurrfrcerlflt {sd€t3n}ffiqHC aiq-ry{frw t trfr-{"ilzptHIqrilOTrII{qEFT.F1,=IIrytI |
|
| Efiql{ TStIqTeTfrqmftq?DETDETIwr ail-qrerqdqr+qgif, ffi en-qqqf.nET frv.q * dq.t€Eiq-rf,sfordlRd 4.Bf,EqrftGTfuilffiTHM{seiaRq GnilfioTg@wtfr-tqo{tEqsilqfu do{Ifr T{tfueglnHqfuor+i-fu.o GtTfuq-6qq-frft1-qr.rqrtI{s?Fr{utqr}q-6 sHrrxr1es{Sffi\rqeds-f,.fdetffiol |
|
frAtr{zoes/zoogfrqrtrdGilteTft=n-fr oz.o7.2ooge)Tffidfuqr.rqrtt |
|
| s.s+tqqerolErtdqrqrflftsorqo te1srvn{rftt6dgrtfrq-rot$ sfdao'r{urq-dr$[doffrqqilrTw erTDq.uqil{ro)qrqsfuqlq-qlt,d<sup>,rA fiB-nqrfit.froforffiSqi{qTf,of n E,fuEvrqlrr+tr+Esorqrftfu-qTqt=tT |
¶5
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court